Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;125(3):355–368. doi: 10.1111/bju.14967

Table 2.

Results of studies reporting on LVI.

Reference Patients with LVI information, N LVI missing, % LVI positive, % Metastasis LVI present, % Metastasis LVI absent, % Reported univariable analysis Method multivariable analysis Reported multivariable analysis
Gilbert et al. 2016 [15] 177 0 36.7 2‐year RFR 58.3 2‐year RFR 88.3 P < 0.001 Stratified log‐rank test N/A (stratified by LVI)
Li et al. 2015 [16] 78 0 21.8 52.9 14.8 OR 6.500 (1.984–21.291) P = 0.002 Logistic regression analysis

OR 6.521

1.872–22.721

P = 0.003

Kollmannsberger et al. 2015 [1] 1118 1.8 16.4 44.3 14.1 NR NR NR
Daugaard et al. 2014 [17] 683 44.3 24.9 42.6 26.4 HR 2.62 (2.03–3.39) P < 0.001 Cox prop. hazards model

HR 1.57

1.64–2.99

P < 0.001

Keskin et al. 2011 [18] 70 0 32.9 26.1 12.8 P = 0.322 NR NR
Nicolai et al. 2011 [39] 163 10.9 38.0 25.8 11.9 P = 0.032 NR NR
Sturgeon et al. 2011 [19] 331 10.8 27.8 NR NR NR Cox prop. hazards model

HR 3.22

2.17–4.78

P < 0.001*

Kollmannsberger et al. 2010 [20] 206 7.6 29.1 50.0 13.0 NR NR NR
Albers et al. 2003 [10] 152 7.9 48.7 52.7 23.1 P = 0.001 Logistic regression analysis OR 3.7143 (1.8501–7.4566) P < 0.001
Atsü et al. 2003 [21] 132 0 36.4 27.1 22.6 P = 0.7 Cox prop. hazards model LVI NS
Daugaard et al. 2003 [22] 145 51.8 31.7 54.3 NR NR NR NR
Spermon et al. (2002) [40] 50 0 36.0 61.1 12.5 P = 0.001 Multivariate logistic model P = 0.001
Alexandre et al. 2001 [23] 84 4.5 47.6 NR NR RR 5.3 (2.0–14.2) P < 0.001 Cox prop. hazards model

RR 3.8

1.4–10.4

P = 0.008

Roeleveld et al. 2001 [24] 79 12.2 41.8 51.5 10.9 P < 0.001 Logistic regression analysis P < 0.001
Sweeney et al. 2000 [43] 178 39.0 51.1 50.5 20.7 P < 0.001 NR NR
Colls et al. 1999 [25] 243 2.0 37.9 45.7 17.2 P < 0.001 NR NR
Sogani et al. 1998 [26] 105 0 19.0 60.0 16.5 P < 0.001 Cox prop. hazards model

OR 4.2

P < 0.001

Maher and Lee 1998 [27] 41 2.4 26.8 54.5 20.0 P = 0.025 NR NR
Albers et al. 1997 [47] 78 0 41.0 62.5 17.4 P < 0.001 Maximum likelihood analysis P = 0.010
Gels et al. 1995 [28] VI: 154 0 VI: 23.4% VI: 52.8 VI: 19.5 P < 0.001 Logistic regression analysis OR 4.24, P < 0.001
Nicolai and Pizzocaro 1995 [29] 28 67.1 35.7 50 11.1 P = 0.069 NR NR
Moul et al. 1994 [44] 92 0

VI: 41.3

LI: 21.7

VI: 76.3

LI: 85.0

VI: 16.7

LI: 29.2

VI: P < 0.001

LI: P < 0.001

Logistic regression analysis VI: P < 0.001
Ondrus and Hornak 1994 [30] 80 0 40.0 53.1 18.8 P = 0.042 NR NR
Tekgül et al. 1995 [31] 36 37.9 27.8 40.0 NR P > 0.05 NR NR
Read et al. 1992 [32]

LI: 362

VI: 363

LI: 2.9

VI: 2.7

LI: 16.9

VI: 47.1

2‐year RFR

LI: 59

VI: 65

2‐year RFR

LI: 79

VI: 86

LI: P < 0.001

VI: P < 0.001

Cox prop. hazards model VI: P < 0.001
Sturgeon et al. 1992 [33] 103 1.9 32.0 60.6 24.3 P < 0.001 NR NR
Rørth et al. 1991 [34] 77 7.2 58.4 37.8 18.8 NR NR NR
Klepp et al. 1990 [42] 265 5.0 28.3 65.3 25.8 P < 0.001 Logistic regression analysis P < 0.001
Wishnow et al. 1989 [46] 82 0 25.6 52.4 21.3 NR NR NR
Dunphy et al. 1988 [35] 93 0 34.4 53.1 18.0 P < 0.01 Cox regression analysis P = 0.99
Fung et al. 1988 [41] 60 0 50.0 46.7 20.0 P = 0.05 NR NR
Thompson et al. 1988 [36] 34 5.6

VI: 29.4

LI: 52.9

VI: 40.0

LI: 55.6

VI: 29.2

LI: 6.3

VI: P > 0.1

LI: P < 0.005

Cox regression analysis Only LI significant
Freedman et al. 1987 [37]

LI: 256

VI: 259

LI: 1.2

VI: 2.3

LI: 18.7

VI: 50.6

2‐year RFR

LI: 45

VI: 57

2‐year RFR

LI: 80

VI: 90

LI: P < 0.001

VI: P < 0.001

Cox prop. hazards model

LI: P < 0.001

VI: P < 0.001

Hoskin et al 1986 [38]

VI: 118

LI: 116

VI: 6.3

LI: 7.9

VI: 31.4

LI: 18.1

VI: 45.9

LI: 57.1

VI: 23.5

LI: 23.2

VI: P < 0.01

LI: P < 0.005

Cox proportional hazards model

VI: NS

LI: HR 3.7, P < 0.01

N/A, not applicable; LI, lymphatic invasion; NR, not reported; NS, not significant; RFR, relapse‐free rate. *With imputation of missing data.