Table 2.
Synthetic# , ## | Pro | Contra | |
---|---|---|---|
Polyethers | Polyethyleneglycol (PEG) |
‐ FDA approved ‐ High water content hydrogel after crosslinking |
‐ Adhesive capacity has to be introduced ‐ Biodegradability has to be improved### |
Polyesters | Poly(epsiloncaprolacton) (PCL) |
‐ FDA approved ‐ Biodegradable (lipases esterases) |
‐ Adhesive capacity has to be introduced ‐ Relatively hydrophobic |
Polyacrylates | Poly(2‐hydroxyethylmethacrylate) (PHEMA) |
‐Functional groups for introducing adhesive functionality ‐ Well hydrated ‐ Biodegradable (75% in 17 days) |
Adhesive capacity has to be introduced |
Polyacrylamides | Poly(acrylamide) (PA) |
‐ Tunable stiffness ‐ Protocols for controlled protein coupling available |
‐ Adhesive capacity has to be introduced ‐ Hydrogel precursor is toxic (= not biodegradable) |
Polypeptides | Puramatrix™ |
‐ Intrinsic nanofiber scaffold hence 3D ‐ Encapsulation of cells under physiological conditions ‐ Easily modified at amino acid level with adhesive sequence ‐ Injectable ‐ Biodegradable ‐ Softer than fibrin and collagen gels |
Background information is indicated by symbols.
Synthetic polymers are more strictly defined than their natural counterparts and purity of components may guarantee that no pathogens are present.
Often microfibers are frequently used, but actually, this is a 2D environment.
For instance, by incorporating matrix metalloproteinase cleavable motifs.