Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;13(4):771–783. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201902860

Table 3.

Calculated adsorption energies of the atomic species on the (6×6) (100), (4×6) (110), and (4×4) (111) surfaces of Na and Li.[a]

Material

Method

Absorption energies [eV atom−1]

(100)

(110)

(111)

bridge

hollow

ontop

hollow

long‐bridge

short‐bridge

ontop

bridge

fcc

hcp

ontop

Na

PBE

−0.81

−0.90

−0.59

−0.81

−0.82

−0.79

−0.78

−0.88

−1.11

−0.84

−0.51

BEEF‐vdW

−0.87 (0.26)

−0.98 (0.26)

−0.67 (0.23)

−0.89 (0.27)

−0.90 (0.25)

−0.85 (0.24)

−0.85 (0.25)

−0.95 (0.26)

−1.16 (0.25)

−0.92 (0.26)

−0.57 (0.26)

Li

PBE

−1.233

−1.273

−1.073

−1.343

−1.353

−1.353

−1.393

−1.333

−1.613

−1.223

−0.903

BEEF‐vdW

−1.27 (0.15)

−1.32 (0.15)

−1.10 (0.13)

−1.38 (0.14)

−1.38 (0.13)

−1.38 (0.13)

−1.43 (0.14)

−1.36 (0.15)

−1.65 (0.16)

−1.26 (0.15)

−1.01 (0.12)

[a] For BEEF‐vdW, the calculated standard deviation of the adsorption energy is given in parentheses.