Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD002106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub4

Bugmann 1998.

Methods RCT. Randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding of participants and investigators (including outcome assessors) not reported.
Participants 76 patients (age range 3 months to 15 years, mean age 3.4 years, mean %TBSA 2.1%) with partial thickness burns presenting to an emergency department within 24 hours of injury
Interventions Silicon‐coated nylon dressing (Mepitel, Molnlycke Health Care, USA) covered with a gauze soaked in chlorhexidine versus SSD (Flamazine, Smith and Nephew) covered by tulle gras and gauze
Outcomes Time to complete wound healing 
 Number of dressing changes 
 Incidence of wound infection
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Random assignment but method not specified
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Care protocol differed. Participants and investigators not blinded. Blinding of assessors not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Withdrawal greater than 10% but similar between groups and reasons for missing data unlikely to be related to outcomes
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Pilot study ‐ other outcomes such as pain and adverse events not reported
Other bias Unclear risk Characteristics at baseline not reported for all participants in the randomised groups