Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD002106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub4

Noordenbos 1999.

Methods RCT. Method of randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding of participants and investigators (including outcome assessors) not reported.
Participants 14 patients (mean age 23.4 years) with moderate to deep partial thickness burns (mean %TBSA: 13.3%). Burn wounds to hands, face, buttocks, feet and genitalia were excluded.
Interventions Biosynthetic dressing (TransCyte) versus twice daily application of SSD.
Outcomes Time to complete wound healing 
 Adverse events
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Participants acted as own control. Two burned sites on each patient "chosen randomly" but method of randomisation not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Care protocols were different so blinding of patients and investigators not feasible. Not stated whether there were separate assessors.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No reported withdrawals or dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes reported
Other bias Unclear risk Patients acted as own control so potential unit of analysis errors