Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD002106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub4

Phipps 1988.

Methods RCT. Randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding of participants and investigators (including outcome assessors) not reported.
Participants 196 patients with burns (mean %TBSA: 1) presenting to an emergency department.
Interventions Hydrocolloid dressing (Granuflex, Squibb Surgicare) versus chlorhexidine‐impregnated tulle‐gras (Bactigras, Smith & Nephew Healthcare Limited). Dressings changed at weekly intervals.
Outcomes Number of days to complete healing 
 Incidence of infection
Notes Withdrawals: 
 I: 42/92 (45.7%) 
 C: 35/104 (33.7%) 
 Loss to follow‐up 
 I: 42/92 (45.7%) 
 C: 35/104 (33.7%)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "allocated randomly" ‐ no further information provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 77 patients were lost to follow‐up. Reasons for leaving early not fully described. Not an intention‐to‐treat analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk For the outcome number of days to complete healing means reported, but no SDs
Other bias Low risk None detected