Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD002022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002022.pub3

Kienbaum 2000.

Methods Random allocation, method not reported. Withdrawal symptoms for 11 in each group, biochemistry & haemodynamics for 10 in each group. Participants blind to anaesthetic used.
Participants 25 (8 female, 17 male) in MMT. Mean (±SE) (1) 89±23 (2) 106 ± 19 mg/day. Last dose 24h before naloxone. Mean age 29 years. Duration of addiction 90 mo, MMT 20 mo. Inpatient treatment ‐ intensive care unit and psychiatric ward.
Interventions General anaesthesia with (1) propofol (2) methohexital. Naloxone iv 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2 and 6.4mg at 15min intervals, then 0.8mg/h for 24h. Intubated and ventilated. Naltrexone 50mg/d, oral, for at least 4 weeks following detox.
Outcomes Mean daily withdrawal score. Time for score to return to baseline. Levels of catecholamines in plasma. Cardiovascular parameters. Number relapsing to heroin and completing follow‐up.
Notes Withdrawal assessed by Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale. Country: Germany
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Quote: "Two groups ... each received different aesthetics according to a randomisation list." Method of sequence generation not reported.
Allocation concealment? High risk Patients blinded to allocation, but it appears unlikely that allocation was concealed from treating staff.
Blinding? 
 Subjective outcomes ‐ intensity of withdrawal, adverse effects Unclear risk Patients blind to allocation, but unclear whether observers and treating staff also blind.
Blinding? 
 Objective outcomes ‐ duration of treatment, completion of treatment Low risk These outcomes considered unlikely to be affected by lack of blinding.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Exclusions and dropouts similar in two groups.
Free of selective reporting? Low risk None apparent
Free of other bias? Low risk None apparent
Other bias: Selection of comparison cohort Low risk Experimental and comparison groups drawn from same population.
Other bias: Comparability of cohorts Low risk Demographics of groups similar.
Other bias: Representativeness of exposed cohort Low risk Participants drawn from methadone substitution program.
Other bias: Ascertainment of exposure Low risk Data collection established by study protocol.