Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;13(1):e201960069. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201960069

Table 1.

Experimental design from real‐life hospital touch surfaces and overall hygienic levels between different locations

ATP RLU/cm2 TPC CFU/cm2 and indicator bacteria
Sampling location Surface area (cm2) Average (ATP) SD (ATP) Min (ATP) Max (ATP) N (ATP) Average (TPC) SD (TPC) Min (TPC) Max (TPC) N (TPC, indicators) S. aureus a (%) Enterococci a (%) Gram‐negativesa (%)
Common area table 100 1.2 1.2 0.1 3.9 11 3.6 7.1 0.5 29 14 7.1 7.1 0
Chair armrest emergeny unit 47–53 6.0 5.0 0.1 16 16 7.8 16.6 0.5 85 24 8.3 0.0 0
Chair armrest childrens' unit 44 6.4 7.5 0.5 37 34 2.9 8.8 0
Toilet door handle 23–25 1.4 1.9 0.0 6.0 9 6.2 8.6 0.5 7.0 6 33.3 16.7 0
Toilet door puller 64 4.9 4.5 0.2 14 8 1.3 0.8 0.5 3.0 10 20 0 0
Toilet door lock 37 21.5 48.4 1.0 190 14 35.7 7 0
Total 3.6 4.3 0.0 16 44 7.8 20.4 0.5 190 112 11.6 5 0
Statistical significanceb P value (sampling location) P < .05 P < .05, post hoc: toilet door lock vs toilet door puller P < .007
a

Percentage of positive findings per total number of samples.

b

Statistical significance level of ATP and TPC (2‐WAY ANOVA). LOG transformation used for TPC to normalize data.