Table IV:

Table coverage (in proportion) marginalized across different simulation settings.^c

	Population Beta Weights			MZ:DZ Twin Pair Sample Size				Parameter		Population
	0	0.3	0.69	16:32	24:24	166:332	249:249	a2	c2	${\chi }_1^2$	${\chi }_{10}^2$	normal
Robust CI*	0.91	0.89	0.89	0.88	0.87	0.92	0.92	0.90	0.89	0.84	0.92	0.93
Typical CI*	0.84	0.83	0.86	0.88	0.86	0.83	0.81	0.86	0.82	0.75	0.88	0.90
Typical CI Corrected by $\sqrt{2}$	0.95	0.94	0.95	0.96	0.95	0.93	0.92	0.95	0.93	0.89	0.97	0.97
Standard DEA Bootstrap standard CI*	0.93	0.91	0.90	0.91	0.91	0.91	0.92	0.91	0.91	0.87	0.93	0.93
Univariate DEA WGS Bootstrap standard CI*	0.94	0.92	0.92	0.93	0.93	0.92	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.9	0.94	0.94
Standard DEB .5 Bootstrap standard CI	0.96	0.97	0.99	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97
Univariate DEB .5 WGS Bootstrap standard CI	0.97	0.98	0.99	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.97

^cSignificantly lower coverage than expected at p < .05 across all conditions. Note: The lowest admissible coverage varies slightly across conditions, however the lowest admissible rate is .949. All numbers are proportions.