Table V:

Number of tested intervals (simulated 10,000 times each) out of 192 (with proportion in parentheses) that had significantly many misses ^d

	Miss Interval too Low	Miss Interval too High
Robust CI	146(76)	133(.69)
Typical CI	163(.85)	159(.83)
Typical CI Correct by $\sqrt{2}$	53(.28)	44(.21)
Standard DEA Bootstrap standard CI	159(.83)	100(.52)
Univariate DEA WGS Bootstrap standard CI	130(.68)	99(.52)
Standard DEB .5 Bootstrap standard CI	40(.21)	11(.06)

^dusing this method we would expect each CI method to have approximately nine or ten (0.05 × 192) cases in which the method was found to have too many misses due to chance [i.e., the expected value of each cell under perfect conditions is 9.6 (0.05)].