Table 1:
Singing behavior | statistics (F) | Effect size | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MALES + T (n=4) | H+3 | H+10 | H+17 | H+24 | HF | hay | ηp2 | |
1st quartile frequency (Hz) | 3408.90 ± 238.59 | 3972.00 ± 174.84 | 3938.09 ± 158.34 | 3959.94 ± 174.67 | 3,9 | 4.599* | 0.61 | |
5% frequency (Hz) | 2678.48 ± 211.49 | 3151.92 ± 134.95 | 3104.71 ± 116.64 | 3110.98 ± 117.10 | 3,9 | 3.041(*) | 0.50 | |
95% frequency (Hz) | 5144.30 ± 379.10 | 5657.25 ± 269.51 | 5704.06 ± 282.06 | 5804.64 ± 299.91a | 3,9 | 4.970* | 0.62 | |
Center frequency (Hz) | 3885.87 ± 288.02 | 4471.15 ± 160.92 | 4443.06 ± 163.51 | 4504.88 ± 199.00 | 3,9 | 4.365* | 0.59 | |
Maximum frequency (Hz) | 4076.81 ± 247.94 | 4600.31 ± 150.85 | 4517.86 ± 102.38 | 4630.25 ± 124.46 | 3,9 | 3.375(*) | 0.53 | |
IQR bandwidth (Hz) | 957.58 ± 108.04 | 990.28 ± 109.09 | 995.41 ± 70.72 | 1027.85 ± 98.30 | 3,9 | 0.192 | 0.06 | |
90% bandwidth (Hz) | 2465.81 ± 261.59 | 2505.31 ± 263.77 | 2599.33 ± 185.48 | 2693.64 ± 226.66 | 3,9 | 0.584 | 0.16 | |
Average power (dB) | 39.04 ± 2.20 | 50.08 ± 0.75aa | 50.10 ± 0.96aa | 49.72 ± 1.13aa | 3,9 | 14.690*** | 0.83 | |
Maximum power (dB) | 71.80 ± 2.15 | 81.93 ± 0.70aa | 82.06 ± 0.96aa | 81.39 ± 1.15aa | 3,9 | 13.700** | 0.82 | |
RMS amplitude (U) | 76.91 ± 15.65 | 236.71 ± 20.59aaa | 242.19 ± 24.27aaa | 236.98 ± 29.44aaa | 3,9 | 21.42*** | 0.88 | |
Maximum amplitude (U) | 681.08 ± 117.49 | 1877.33 ± 162.70aaa | 1973.63 ± 214.13aaa | 1920.89 ± 256.68aaa | 3,9 | 20.62*** | 0.87 |
The mean ± SEM of each measure is presented for each time point. Last columns indicate the statistical results (F) of the one-way repeated measures ANOVA analyzing changes in time for each song parameter, the corresponding degrees of freedom (DF) and effect sizes.
p<0.10
p<0.05
p<0.01
p<0.001
Significant differences compared to day 3 revealed by the Tukey post hoc tests are indicated in bold with a p<0.05, aa p<0.01, aaa p<0.001.