Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 15;162(4):729–736. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04196-6

Table 1.

Surgical variables for all patients, as well as in the presence and absence of subgaleal drains (+drain, −drain)

Surgical variables Total +Drain −Drain p value
n (%) or mean ± SD
Access Curved: straight incision

76 (50.7%),

74 (49.3%)

43 (68.3%),

20 (31.7%)

33 (37.9%),

54 (62.1%)

p < 0.0001

Longer incision ≥ 15 cm

Shorter incision < 15 cm

63 (42.2%),

86 (57.7%)

42 (67.7%),

20 (32.3%)

21 (24.1%),

66 (75.9%)

p < 0.0001

Larger craniotomy ≥ 27 cm2:

Smaller craniotomy < 27 cm2

71 (47.7%),

78 (52.3%)

39 (62.9%),

23 (37.1%)

32 (36.8%),

55 (63.2%)

p < 0.01
Intraoperative ventricle opening 21 (14%) 8 (12.7%) 13 (14.9%) ns
Closure non-watertight dural closure: watertight dural closure with or without sealants

34 (22.7%),

116 (77.3)

7 (11.1%),

56 (88.9%)

27 (31.0%),

60 (69.0%)

p < 0.01
suture: staples

45 (30%),

105 (70%)

8 (12.7%),

55 (87.3%)

37 (42.5%),

50 (57.5%)

p < 0.0001
compressive dressing 46 (30.7%) 27 (42.9%) 19 (21.8%) p < 0.01

P-values are calculated for surgical variables after stratifying in two groups (+drain vs −drain). Patients with curved incisions, longer incisions, and larger craniotomies received drains significantly more often. With watertight dural closure with or without sealants, drains were placed significantly more often; wounds were significantly more often closed with stables, when a drain was used. Patients with subgaleal drains received compressive dressings more frequently

+drain, patient with subgaleal drainage; −drain, patient without subgaleal drainage; ns, not significant; SD, standard deviation