Table 1.
Surgical variables for all patients, as well as in the presence and absence of subgaleal drains (+drain, −drain)
| Surgical variables | Total | +Drain | −Drain | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) or mean ± SD | |||||
| Access | Curved: straight incision |
76 (50.7%), 74 (49.3%) |
43 (68.3%), 20 (31.7%) |
33 (37.9%), 54 (62.1%) |
p < 0.0001 |
|
Longer incision ≥ 15 cm Shorter incision < 15 cm |
63 (42.2%), 86 (57.7%) |
42 (67.7%), 20 (32.3%) |
21 (24.1%), 66 (75.9%) |
p < 0.0001 | |
|
Larger craniotomy ≥ 27 cm2: Smaller craniotomy < 27 cm2 |
71 (47.7%), 78 (52.3%) |
39 (62.9%), 23 (37.1%) |
32 (36.8%), 55 (63.2%) |
p < 0.01 | |
| Intraoperative ventricle opening | 21 (14%) | 8 (12.7%) | 13 (14.9%) | ns | |
| Closure | non-watertight dural closure: watertight dural closure with or without sealants |
34 (22.7%), 116 (77.3) |
7 (11.1%), 56 (88.9%) |
27 (31.0%), 60 (69.0%) |
p < 0.01 |
| suture: staples |
45 (30%), 105 (70%) |
8 (12.7%), 55 (87.3%) |
37 (42.5%), 50 (57.5%) |
p < 0.0001 | |
| compressive dressing | 46 (30.7%) | 27 (42.9%) | 19 (21.8%) | p < 0.01 | |
P-values are calculated for surgical variables after stratifying in two groups (+drain vs −drain). Patients with curved incisions, longer incisions, and larger craniotomies received drains significantly more often. With watertight dural closure with or without sealants, drains were placed significantly more often; wounds were significantly more often closed with stables, when a drain was used. Patients with subgaleal drains received compressive dressings more frequently
+drain, patient with subgaleal drainage; −drain, patient without subgaleal drainage; ns, not significant; SD, standard deviation