Table 3.
Risk Recommendations in paper-based and web-based groups in Singapore (2016–2018).
| Risk Recommendations | Paper-Based N = 481 (%) | Web-Based N = 394 (%) | Odds Ratio* (95% CI) | p – Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥1 Recommendations | 22 (4.57) | 64 (16.24) | 3.99 (2.41–6.59) | < 0.0001 |
| ≥2 Recommendations | 3 (0.62) | 8 (2.03) | 3.01 (0.81–11.12) | 0.0987 |
| Genetic counselling | ||||
| Cancer | 3 (0.62) | 10 (2.54) | 3.73 (1.06–13.19) | 0.0409 |
| Cardiovascular | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.51) | 6.15 (0.15–254.75) | 0.3392 |
| Surveillance | ||||
| Breast MRI/Chemoprophylaxis | 7 (1.46) | 22 (5.58) | 3.82 (1.63–8.95) | 0.0020 |
| CRC Screening Early Or More Frequent | 16 (3.33) | 31 (7.87) | 2.45 (1.32–4.53) | 0.0045 |
Note: Variables were summarized as frequency (percentage). Univariate logistic regression is fit to find association between risk recommendations (yes/no) and group type (web based/paper based participants).”