Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;33(2):191–207. doi: 10.1007/s10548-020-00752-x

Table 1.

Relationship between P300 amplitude and behavioral measures

P3amp
Pre-to-post
RT-M
Pre-to-post
RT-M
Pre-to-during
RT-V
Pre-to-post
RT-V
Pre-to-during
Omissions
Pre-to-post
Omissions
Pre-to-during
P3amp Correlation 1 − 0.150 − 0.253 − 0.265 − 0.457 − 0.581* − 0.673**
 Pre-to-post Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.553 0.311 0.288 0.057 0.011 0.002
RT-M Correlation 1 0.876*** 0.633** 0.281 0.241 0.114
 Pre-to-post Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.000 0.0048 0.257 0.335 0.651
RT-M Correlation 1 0.612** 0.482* 0.123 0.026
 Pre-to-during Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.007 0.043 0.628 0.918
RT-V Correlation 1 0.311 0.139 0.196
 Pre-to-post Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.210 0.583 0.435
RT-V Correlation 1 0.2633 0.383
 Pre-to-during Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.291 0.117
Omissions Correlation 1 0.808***
   Pre-to-post Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.000
Omissions Correlation 1
  Pre-to-during Sig. (2-tailed) 0
N 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

“Pre-to-post “ = (post – pre)/pre*100; “ pre-to-during “ = (during – pre)/pre*100

“RT-M”: reaction time mean, “-V”: variability. “P3amp”: P300 amplitude. “Sig.”: Significance Testing

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Correlation = Spearman Correlation

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

***Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (2-tailed)