Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 4;200(1):12–21. doi: 10.1111/cei.13413

Table 2.

Relationship between B7‐H5 expression and tumor pathology and prognosis

Cancer type Samples B7‐H5 expression Pathological correlates Clinical outcomes Refs
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 136 68% (higha) No correlation Better OS 17
32% (low)
92 77% (positiveb) Highest expression in low‐grade pancreatic intra‐epithelial neoplasia (PanIN) Better survival rate 18
Lung cancer 195 (cohort 1) 61% (positive) High TIL intensity and EGFR mutation status Decreased OS (not statistically) 19
197 (cohort 2) 64% (positive)
Osteosarcoma 55 68% (positive) High expression in metastatic tissue Worse five‐year event‐free‐survival 20
Breast cancer 50 56% (high) Related to regional lymph node metastasis and advanced disease Worse prognosis 21
Oral squamous cell carcinoma 210 65% (high) No correlation Poor OS 22
Human clear cell renal cell carcinoma 87 Unclear Related to larger tumor size and advanced TNM stage Poor OS 23
92 95% (positive) Tumor size, clinical stage and histological grade Poor OS 24
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 153 (cohort 1) 49% high) More likely to relapse and metastasize Poor OS 25
65 (cohort 2) 68% (high)
Bladder urothelial carcinoma 212 84% (positive) Significantly related to tumor stage, tumor size, tumor grade and lymph node metastasis Poor OS and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival 26
26% (high)
Colorectal carcinoma 63 48% (high) Deeper infiltration depth Poor OS 27
Glioma 669 Unclear Low malignancy Better OS 28
Gastric cancer 124 53% (high) Related to advanced clinical stages, deep tumor infiltration, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis Poor OS 29
111 50% (high) inversely related to the depth of tumor invasion, distant metastasis and disease stage Higher 5‐year survival rate 30
a

High: high B7‐H5 expression.

b

Positive: B7‐H5 express positive.

OS = overall survival; TNM = tumor–node–metastasis.