Cheung 2018.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Blinding of outcome assessment not specifically reported. Key outcomes were objective laboratory measures and were unlikely to be affected by any knowledge of treatment allocation. Interpretation of subjective outcomes may have been influenced by knowledge of treatment allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | There was no pre‐specified protocol identified for this study. The study did not report extractable data for the key outcomes that would be expected for a study of this type (e.g., death (any cause), infection, malignancy, ESKD, doubling of SCr, complete remission, SCr) |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |