Ni 2005.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Blinding of outcome assessment not specifically reported. Key outcomes were objective laboratory measures and were unlikely to be affected by any knowledge of treatment allocation. However, reporting of adverse events may have been influenced by knowledge of treatment allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Preliminary reports, unsure of final number enrolled. 73/102 participants completed 12 months, 28/102 completed 24 months |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Data for outcomes such as ESKD, death (any cause), and malignancy were not reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |