Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 11;77(7):1–8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0103

Table 5. Univariable and Multivariable Mediation Analyses of the Association Between Population Density/Deprivation at Birth and Risk of Nonaffective Psychosis by IQ at 18 Years of Agea.

Pathways and Mediation Effects Unadjusted Model Fully Adjusted Modelb
Effect Estimate (95% CI) P Value Effect Estimate (95% CI) P Value
Deprivation
Path A (exposure-mediator)c −1.58 (−1.68 to −1.48) <.001 −0.70 (−0.78 to −0.62) <.001
Path B (mediator-outcome)d 0.71 (0.68 to 0.75) <.001 0.70 (0.67 to 0.74) <.001
Path C (exposure-outcome)e 1.18 (1.12 to 1.23) <.001 1.07 (1.02 to 1.13) .005
Mediation model
Total effect 1.19 (1.14 to 1.23) <.001 1.08 (1.03 to 1.13) .001
Natural direct effect 1.14 (1.10 to 1.19) <.001 1.06 (1.01 to 1.11) .01
Natural indirect effect 1.04 (1.03 to 1.04) <.001 1.02 (1.01 to 1.02) <.001
Mediation by IQ, % 22 (21 to 25) NA 23 (17 to 49) NA

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

a

Includes participants with no missing data (n = 227 429).

b

Adjusted for paternal age at birth, family income, maternal educational level, paternal educational level, any psychosis or bipolar disorder in parents, and parent(s) born outside of Sweden.

c

Indicates change in IQ Score at 18 years of age, per SD increase in deprivation at birth.

d

Indicates odds of nonaffective psychosis, per SD increase in IQ at 18 years of age.

e

Indicates odds of nonaffective psychosis, per SD increase in deprivation at birth.