Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;5(9):4507–4531. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03839

Table 3. Calculated Energies (Hartree), Energy Differences (kcal/mol) between the Cis- and Trans-Isomers of AzoFL, DFDZ, and DZ and Their Respective Dipole Moments (Debye), Respectively.

compound methoda Etrans Ecis Ecis–transg μ (trans) μ (cis)
AzoFL AM1b 0.261988 0.254685 –4.58 0.17 2.99
  DFTc –1111.176069 –1111.150053 +16.33 0.00 3.12
DFDZ AM1b 0.049665 0.033056 –10.4 0.00 0.66
  HFd –307.595444 –307.593029 +1.52 0.00 0.17
  HFe –307.595444 –307.593029 +1.52 0.00 0.17
  HFf –307.673508 –307.670734 +1.74 0.00 0.18
  DFTc –309.033536 –309.036420 –1.81 0.00 0.22
DZ AM1b 0.050244 0.051651 +0.88 0.00 2.70
  HFd –110.006960 –109.994657 +7.72 0.00 3.37
  DFTc –110.651970 –110.641101 +6.82 0.00 3.20
a

The symmetry of trans-DZ and DFDZ in different methods are C2h, C2v for cis-DZ and DFDZ; C2 for both the trans- and cis-AzoFL.

b

Semiempirical AM1 method using predefined ZDO basis set.

c

B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) basis set.

d

6-31+G(d,p) basis set.

e

6-31++G(d,p) basis set.

f

6-311+G(d,p) basis set.

g

The negative values of energy difference in respective cases indicate the cis-preference over trans-isomer.