Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2020 Jan 7;120:101898. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.101898

Table 3-.

Predictive performance of PREDICT29 in Brazil (A) and GC6 (B) Cohorts.

(A) Brazil
Model used AUC Sensitivity Specificity
glmnet 0.929 (0.914, 0.944) 0.741 (0.703, 0.779) 0.867 (0.836, 0.897)
SVM 0.915 (0.900, 0.930) 0.756 (0.716, 0.796) 0.836 (0.807, 0.866)
ranger 0.867 (0.843, 0.891) 0.679 (0.641, 0.717) 0.830 (0.795, 0.866)
XGBoost 0.932 (0.919, 0.945) 0.794 (0.757, 0.830) 0.860 (0.828, 0.893)
AVERAGE 0.911 (0.894, 0.928) 0.742 (0.704, 0.780) 0.848 (0.816, 0.880)
(B) GC6
Model used AUC Sensitivity Specificity
glmnet 0.664 (0.655, 0.674) 0.497 (0.459, 0.535) 0.787 (0.750, 0.824)
SVM 0.685 (0.676, 0.695) 0.535 (0.516, 0.554) 0.780 (0.766, 0.795)
ranger 0.683 (0.673, 0.693) 0.649 (0.616, 0.683) 0.651 (0.623, 0.678)
XGBoost 0.688 (0.677, 0.699) 0.549 (0.531, 0.567) 0.803 (0.787, 0.819)
AVERAGE 0.680 (0.670, 0.690) 0.558 .531, 0.585) 0.755 (0.732, 0.779)