Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;93(1107):20190237. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190237

Table 5.

Recent proton therapy studies for pediatric brain tumors

Author [ref] year Tumor type # pts Median
Age
[years]
Median
Dose
[GyRBE]
(range)
Median
FU
[months]
(range)
Outcome Late Toxicity
De Amorim Bernstein et al.96 2013 AT/RT 10 2.3 50.4 (50.4–55.8);
three pts CSI (18–23.4)
27.3
(11.3–99.4)
LC 100%, DC 80%, OS 90% Endocrine G2 (2pts hypothyroidism, 3pts GH deficiency)
Mc Govern et al.84 2014 AT/RT 31 1.6 50.4 (9–54);
14 pts CSI (23.4–36)
24
(3-53)
Median OS 34.3mo, PFS 20.8mo five pts imaging changes interpreted as RN
Weber et al.95 2015 AT/RT 15 1.4 54 all patients, no CSI 33.4
(9.7–69.2)
LF 20%, DBF 27%, SF 2%. 2y OS 64.6%, 2y PFS 66% 2y tox free survival 90%. No decrease of QoL after PT
Bishop et al.91 2014 Craniopharyngioma 52
(21 PT)
8.9 50.4 (50.4–54) 59.6
(PT 33mo)
3y OS 96%, nodular FFS 96%, cystic FFS 76%. Same outcome for PT and IMRT Endocrine G2 77%. No difference between PT and IMRT
MacDonald et al.97 2013 Ependymoma 70 3.2 55.8 (50.4–60) 46
(12–140.4)
3y LC 83%, PFS 76%, OS 95%
5y LC 77%, DC 83%
one pt hypothyroidism, two pts GH deficit, two pts hearing loss, two pts cavernoma. No drop in MI and OAS scores
Mizumoto et al.98 2015 Ependymoma 6 5 56.7 (50.4–61.2) 24.5
(13-44)
OS 100%, PFS 80% one pt one-time seizure, one pt alopecia, no difficulty in daily life
Ares et al.92 2016 Ependymoma 50 2.6 59.4 (54–60) 43.4
(8.5–113.7)
5y LC 78%, OS 84% 38% G1/2, two pts G3 deafness, one pt G5 brainstem necrosis
Sato et al.99 2017 Ependymoma 79
(41 PT)
3.7 55.8 (50.4–59.4) PT 31.2
(7.2–86.4)
IMRT 58.8
(13.2–140.4)
3y OS 81% IMRT vs 97% PT (p = .08), PFS 60% IMRT vs 82% PT (p = .0307), Recurrence 55% IMRT vs 17% PT (p = .005) Vascular disorder G2 + 10% (6 RN, one stroke, one cavernoma)
MacDonald et al.93 2011 Germ cell tumors 22 11 Total 44 (30.6–57.6)
1pt IF only
seven pts WVRT 19.5–23.4
1pt WBRT 25.5
13 pts CSI 18.3–27
28
(13-97)
LC 100%, PFS 95%, OS 100% two pts hypothyroidism, 2pts GH deficit. No new NC or auditory deficit
Hug et al.94 2002 Low grade glioma 27 8.7 55.2 (50.4–63) 39.6
(7.2–81.6)
LF 22%, OS 85% Moya-Moya one pt
Greenberger et al.78 2014 Low grade glioma 32
(nine mix PT and photons)
11 52.2 (48.6–54) 91.2
(38.4–218.4)
6y PFS 89.7%, 8y PFS 82.8%, 8y OS 100% Endocrine G2 > 80% at 10y (>40 GFy to pituitary and hypothalamus is RF), two pts G3 vasculopathy (Moya-Moya), age > 7y and hippocampus dose RF for NC decline, VA/VF decline four events, other visual tox nine events
Jimenez et al.100 2013 Medulloblastoma / supratentorial PNET 15 2.9 Total 54 (39.6–54)
CSI 21.6 (18–30.6)
39
(3-102)
3y LF 7.7%, OS 85.6% Ototoxicity nine pts (2 G3), Endocrine G2 three pts, significant height loss, NS if GH deficiency pts excluded, no loss from baseline IQ
Eaton et al.101 2016 Medulloblastoma 88 (45 PT) 6 Total 54–55.8
CSI 23.4 (18–27)
74.4 PT pts
84 photon pts
6y RFS 78.8% PT vs 76.5% photon (p = .948). 6y OS 82% PT vs 87.6% photon (p = .285) NR
Yock et al.102 2016 Medulloblastoma 59 6.6 Total 54
CSI 23.4 (23.4–36)
84
(62.4–98.4)
3y PFS 83%
5y PFS 80%, OS 83%
7y PFS 75%, OS 81%
Ototoxicity G3 + 12% at 3y and 16% at 5y and 7y, FSIQ decline by 1.5 point/y, Endocrine deficit 27%, 55 and 63% at 3, 5 and 7y, Cataract two pts, BS injury one pt, Stroke two pt

NS, not statistically significative. WBRT, whole brain radiotherapy; AT/RT, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor; CSI, craniospinal irradiation ; DBF, distant brain failure; DC, distant control; FFS, failure free survival;FSIQ, full scale intelligence quotient; FU, follow-up; G, toxicity grade;GH, growth hormone; GyRBE, Gray in relative biological effectiveness; IF, involved field;LC, local control; LF, local failure;MI, mean intelligence; NC, neurocognitive; NR, not reported; OAS, overall adaptive skills; OS, overall survival;PFS, progression free survival;RF, risk factor; RFS, recurrence free survival;RN, radiation necrosis; SF, spinal failure, PT: proton therapy;VA, visual acuity; VF, visual field; WVRT, whole ventricle radiotherapy; mo, months;pts, patients.