Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;93(1107):20190334. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190334

Table 1.

Summary of phenomenological RBE proton models based on a similar formalism of the LQ model (equation 1)12 13

Model Cell lines
(size)
RBEmax RBEmin Parameter values
p0 p1 p2 p3
Carabe14 V79
(44)
p0+p1LETd(α/β)x p2+p3LETd(α/β)x 0.843 0.413644 1.09 0.01612
Chen15 V79
(14)
p0αx+1ep1LETd2αxp2LETd 1.0 0.1 0.0013 0.045 --
McNamara16 Multiple
(285)
p0+p1LETd(α/β)x p2+p3(α/β)xLETd 0.99064 0.35605 1.1012 −0.0039
Peeler17 Multiple
(48)
p0+p1LETd3(α/β)x p2+p3(α/β)xLETd3 0.75 0.00143 1.24 0.00074
Tilly18 Multiple
(11)
1+p1LETd(α/β)x 1.0 0.309* or
0.550964
-- -- --
Rørvik12 Multiple
(85)
p0+p1LETd(α/β)x 1.0 1.0 0.645 -- --
Wilkens19 V79
(19)
p0+p1LETdαx 1.0 0.1 0.02 -- --
Wedenberg20 V79
(19)
p0+p1LETd(α/β)x 1.0 1.0 0.434 -- --
Model Cell lines
(size)
RBEmin Other
Belli21 V79
(6)
10.130α(E)d(E)dE 10.2140β(E)d(E)dE αEand βE are biological weighting functions
Jones22 Multiple
(28)
1+LETd0.2230.28×
(αuαx1)
1+LETd0.22 30.28(βuβx1) αu=2.6961-e-3.92αx
βu=0.061-e-50βx

RBE, relative biological effectiveness.

The definition of the RBEmin and RBEmax functions for each model differs as shown, and the fit parameters (p0, p1, p2 and p3) are summarized were applicable. The type of in vitro data and size of each dataset used in the fitting is indicated. The last two models have been separated from the table since the formulations differ. Only the linear fit of the Rørvik et al13 is shown here for simplicity. *For low and high (α/β)x, respectively.