TABLE 10.
Aggregate evidence | Grade C |
---|---|
quality | |
Benefits | Clinicians are most effective when they know the limits of their practice to diagnose comorbid conditions and are aware of resources in their community. |
Risks, harm, cost | Under-identification or inappropriate identification of comorbidities can lead to inadequate or inappropriate treatments. |
Benefit-harm assessment | The importance of adequately identifying and addressing comorbidities outweighs the risk of inappropriate referrals or treatments. |
Intentional vagueness | None. |
Role of patient preferences | The families’ preferences and comfort need to be taken into consideration in identifying and treating or referring their patients with comorbidities, as they are likely to predict engagement and persistence with a treatment. |
Exclusions | None. |
Strength | Recommendation. |
Key references | Pliszka et al150; Pringsheim et al151 |