Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;50(4):330–342. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0125

Table 2. Combined evidence table for combined safety and efficacy outcome*.

Trial Year CEA CAS MT
No. of cases No. of event Age (years) Male (%) DM (%) No. of cases No. of event Age (years) Male (%) DM (%) No. of cases No. of event Age (years) Male (%) DM (%)
ACT 16) 2005–2013 364 12 67.9 56.9 32.4 1,089 41 67.7 61.2 35.6 - - - - -
CREST7) 2000–2008 587 28 69.6 67.5 33.7 594 36 69.0 63.8 32.6 - - - - -
Kougias et al.5) 2011–2013 28 0 - - 48.5 27 1 - - 33.3 - - - - -
SAPPHIRE8) 2000–2002 120 35 72.6 67.1 27.5 117 25 72.5 66.9 25.3 - - - - -
Kolos et al.26) 2009–2013 31 1 67.0 65.0 29.0 - - - - - 24 5 66.1 83.0 21.0
ACST25) 1993–2003 1,560 82 - 65.4 20.3 - - - - - 1,560 108 - 65.6 19.6
ACAS23) 1987–1993 825 33 68.5 66.0 25.0 - - - - - 834 52 67.0 66.0 21.0
VA24) 1983–1987 211 14 64.1 100.0 30.0 - - - - - 233 23 64.7 100.0 27.0

ACAS = Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study; ACST = Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial; ACT 1 = Asymptomatic Carotid Trial; CAS = carotid artery stenting; CEA = carotid endarterectomy; CREST = Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial; DM = diabetes mellitus; MT = medical treatment; SAPPHIRE = Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy; VA = Veterans Affairs.

*Composite outcome of periprocedural death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or nonperiprocedural ipsilateral stroke; Because data on asymptomatic carotid stenosis were not reported separately, those for the mixed population (patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis) were presented; Age was estimated from the frequency distribution table.