Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2020 Jan 2;47(3):1094–1104. doi: 10.1002/mp.13976

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Combining all landmarks together to better visualize the post hoc results by registration type. The vertical bars to the left of the boxplots indicate registrations which were not significantly different. The rigid alignment between CTaligned and CTnon-aligned is denoted by CTaligned vs. CTnon-aligned. Below is a table to more easily display the decrease in average landmark error with the proposed method. The bottom rows in each section show the average error if CTaligned is used as a surrogate for the MR. This represents a “best-case” scenario.