Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Struct Biol. 2020 Feb 4;210(1):107474. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107474

Fig. 2. Cell morphology of HAS3 and MCF10A control cells imaged by conventional and cryo-SEM.

Fig. 2.

(A) Conventional SEM image of chemically-fixed MCF10A cells. (B) Cryo-SEM image of frozen-hydrated MCF10A cells. Tubular extensions are observed (arrow). (C) HAS3 cells prepared for conventional SEM with longer tubular extensions compared to the MCF10A controls. (D) HAS3 cells imaged by cryo-SEM also show tubular extensions (arrow), but they appear flattened. See Fig. S1 for additional cryo-SEM images of HAS3 cells.