Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 29;43(4):469–475. doi: 10.1007/s40618-019-01131-5

Table 3.

The association between BMD response to denosumab at the femoral neck (FN) and serum PTH concentrations

Unstandardized coefficients Standardised coefficients t Sig.
B Standard error Beta
Model 1
 Baseline PTH (ng/L) − 0.057 0.023 − 0.246 − 2.496 0.014
 Age (years) 0.055 0.074 0.074 0.746 0.458
Model 2
 Baseline PTH (ng/L) − 0.049 0.024 − 0.212 − 2.0 0.048
 Baseline eGFR (ml/min) 0.032 0.032 0.104 0.980 0.330
Model 3
 Baseline PTH (ng/L) − 0.058 0.024 − 0.252 − 2.409 0.018
 Presence of secondary risk factors 0.108 1.769 0.006 0.061 0.952

Dependent variable: % change in FN BMD following treatment with denosumab

Significant values are shown in bold