TABLE 3.

Correlations between relative contact scores and own-race recognition advantage (d′ scores for own-race faces - d′ scores for other-race faces) for Chinese, Malay, Indian, and Caucasian participants.

Race of participants	Relative quantity of contact with Chinese	Relative quality of contact with Chinese	Relative quantity of contact with Malays	Relative quality of contact with Malays	Relative quantity of contact with Indians	Relative quality of contact with Indians	Relative quantity of contact with Caucasians	Relative quality of contact with Caucasians
Chinese	–	–	r = 0.45, p = 0.02	r = 0.04, p = 0.84	r = 0.16, p = 0.45	r = −0.06, p = 0.78	r = −0.07, p = 0.72	r = −0.13, p = 0.54
Malay	r = −0.18, p = 0.41	r = 0.09, p = 0.69	–	–	r = −0.24, p = 0.26	r = −0.47, p = 0.02	r = −0.17, p = 0.45	r = −0.21, p = 0.34
Indian	r = 0.30, p = 0.18	r = 0.40, p = 0.07	r = 0.57, p = 0.006	r = −0.07, p = 0.75	–	–	r = −0.20, p = 0.37	r = −0.08, p = 0.72
Caucasian	r = −0.18, p = 0.41	r = −0.03, p = 0.90	r = −0.28, p = 0.20	r = −0.24, p = 0.26	r = 0.10, p = 0.64	r = 0.06, p = 0.80	–	–

Shaded cells indicate significant correlation r values (at α = 0.05) before Bonferroni corrections.