Table 2.
Response variables.
| Total | TBW | PF | Effect estimate (TBW vs. PF) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weseley | 0.461 | ||||
| fair | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||
| good | 17 | 8 | 9 | ||
| excellent | 21 | 12 | 9 | ||
| Morrey (Median [IQR]) | 98 (92–100) | 99.5 (95–100) | 97 (91.5–99.3) | 0.05 (−0.54 - 0.64) | 0.867 |
| Mayo (Median [IQR]) | 100 (85–100) | 100 (92.5–100) | 100 (85–100) | 0.00 (−0.70 - 0.69) | 0.993 |
| DASH (Median [IQR]) | 9.9 (4.1–20.4) | 7.0 (3.6–13.7) | 12.1 (5.5–24.8) | −0.02 (−0.62 - 0.58) | 0.948 |
| SEV in % | 90 (80–95) | 90 (88.9–95) | 90 (80–95) | 0.00 (−0.61 - 0.61) | 0.995 |
| Time of return to work (mean ± sd) | 8.5 ± 5.2 | 6.5 ± 2.2 | 10.9 ± 6.6 | −2.07 (−6.81 - 2.67) | 0.372 |
| Extension deficit in % (Median [IQR]) | 5 (0–10) | 5 (0–10) | 10 (3.8–11.3) | −0.34 (−0.97 - 0.29) | 0.290 |
| Flexion in % (Median [IQR]) | 5 (0–15) | 5 (0–15) | 5 (0–20) | −0.12 (−0.80 - 0.56) | 0.735 |
| Complications | 13 (32.5%) | 8 (40%) | 5 (25%) | 0.0248 | |