Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 26.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2019 Oct 23;394(10208):1560–1579. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32229-9

Table 3:

Current evidence for effects of interventions to address key outcomes and behaviours among people who use opioids extra-medically

Injecting risk behaviours Extra-medical opioid use HIV incidence HCV incidence Skin and soft tissue infections Quality of life
Intervention Effect Size of effect Level Sources Effect Size of effect Level Sources Effect Size of effect Level Sources Effect Size of effect Level Sources Effect Size of effect Level Sources Effect Size of effect Level Sources
Provision of sterile injecting equipment aOR 0.52
(0.32, 0.83)
APWID 131 - - - -  OR/HR/RR 0.42
 (0.22, 0.81)
CPWID 132 ↓? RR 0.77 (0.38, 1.54) C 108 ? - D 86 - - - -
Condom provision - - - - - - - - RR 0.29,
(0.20, 0.43)
AGEN 179 ? - C 180 - - - - - - - -
Naloxone - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Drug consumption rooms RR 0.31
(0.17, 0.55)
CPWID 181 - - - - ? - D 182 ? - D 182  OR 0.47 (0.23, 0.94) E 86 - - - -
Peer-based self-help groups - - - - ↓? - BALC 139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Psychosocial interventions SMD −0.43
(−0.69, −0.18)
A 183  WMES −0.18
 (−0.30, −0.06)
A 184 ? - D 182 ? - D 182 ? - E 185 - - - -
Opioid detoxification alone ×
Oral opioid antagonists × NE A 186 ×  RR 1.39 (0.61, 3.17) A 127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Extended-release opioid antagonists NE A 128 NE A 128,187 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Opioid agonist treatment RR 0.53 (0.4, 0.7) SYNTH A 106  RR 0.48 (0.41, 0.55) SYNTH A 106 RR 0.46
(0.32, 0.67)
C 107 RR 0.50 (0.40, 0.63) C 108 ? - D 86  SMD 0.29 (0.16, 0.42) C 170
Residential rehabilitation NE C 188 NE C 188 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HIV testing + informing of serostatus NE DPWID 135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HCV testing + informing of serostatus × aOR 0.97
(0.94, 1.00)
CPWID 189 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HIV treatment × aOR 0.78
(0.42–1.45)
D 190 - - - - - D 134 - - - - - - - - - - - -
HCV treatment NE DPWID 133 NE DPWID 133 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
STI treatment - - - - - - - - AGEN 191193 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Suicide prevention strategies - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Opioid prescribing limits - - - - ↓? NE DGEN 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Abuse-deterrent opioid formulations NE D 144,195 ? NE D 144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Prescription opioid monitoring programs - - - - ↓? NE DGEN 194,196 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Compulsory drug treatment/drug detention centres NE C* 143,197 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Criminalisation of drug use NE CPWID 147 NE CPWID 147
Overdose Suicide Other injuries Overall mortality
Intervention Effect Size of effect Level Sources Effect Size of effect Level Sources Effect Size of effect Level Sources Effect Size of effect Level Sources
Provision of sterile injecting equipment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Condom provision - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Naloxone - D 198 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Drug consumption rooms - D 199 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Peer-based self-help groups - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Psychosocial interventions - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Opioid detoxification alone
Oral opioid antagonists - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Extended-release opioid antagonists ↓? - A 128 - - - - - - - - ? - A 128,187
Opioid agonist treatment RaRa 0.25 (0.18, 0.36) SYNTH C 111 E 112 E 112 RaRa 0.33 (0.28, 0.39) SYNTH C 111
Residential rehabilitation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HIV testing + informing of serostatus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HCV testing + informing of serostatus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HIV treatment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HCV treatment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
STI treatment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Medication for suicide prevention - - - - ? - AGEN 200 - - - - - - - -
Opioid prescribing limits ↓? - DGEN 194 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Abuse-deterrent opioid formulations ? - DGEN 144 - - - - - - - - ? - D 144
Prescription opioid monitoring programmes ? - DGEN 145,196 - - - - - - - - ? - D 145
Compulsory drug treatment/drug detention centres - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Criminalisation of drug use - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Notes on codes used in this table

Presence or absence of effect

× This intervention does not appear to have a significant effect upon the outcome

↑ This outcome may be increased by the intervention

↓This outcome is decreased by the intervention

- No evidence could be located of the impact of this intervention upon the outcome

? unclear evidence on impact of this intervention on the outcome

Level of evidence

A Consistent conclusions across meta-analyses, high quality systematic reviews, or multiple randomised controlled trials

B Evidence from one or two randomised controlled trials only

C High quality systematic reviews of cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies

D Systematic reviews with inconsistent conclusions from authors or cross-sectional; OR multiple consistent ecological studies

E Cross-sectional association, case series suggesting outcome, single cohort study

GEN Evidence drawn from people who may not specifically use any drugs (including opioids)

PWID People who inject drugs that may not include opioids

ALC Note that this evidence pertains to people attending alcoholics anonymous

NE no pooled quantitative estimate reported

UNotes on codes used in this table

Presence or absence of effect

× This intervention does not appear to have a significant effect upon the outcome

↑ This outcome may be increased by the intervention

↓This outcome is decreased by the intervention

- No evidence could be located of the impact of this intervention upon the outcome

? unclear evidence on impact of this intervention on the outcome

Level of evidence

A Consistent conclusions across meta-analyses, high quality systematic reviews, or multiple randomised controlled trials

B Evidence from one or two randomised controlled trials only

C High quality systematic reviews of cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies

D Systematic reviews with inconsistent conclusions from authors or cross-sectional; OR multiple consistent ecological studies

E Cross-sectional association, case series suggesting outcome, single cohort study

GEN Evidence drawn from people who may not specifically use any drugs (including opioids)

PWID People who inject drugs that may not include opioids

ALC Note that this evidence pertains to people attending alcoholics anonymous

NE no pooled quantitative estimate reported