Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD001169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001169.pub3

van Voris 1981.

Methods Randomised in a double‐blind design
Participants This treatment trial was carried out in February 1978 in University of Rochester, USA on 45 students with laboratory confirmed influenza A/USSR/77 [H1N1]
Interventions Participants received either amantadine 200 mg daily (n = 14) or rimantadine 200 mg daily (n = 14) or inert placebo capsules (n = 12) and followed up for 5 days
Outcomes Efficacy: outcomes reported were symptom scores (Figure 1), duration of temperature (Figure 2 and in the text at page 1130). We used the outcome 'number of participants with temperatures more than 37.5 ºC', 48 hours after commencing medication (a dichotomous outcome). Data on mean duration of fever were not given. The study reported data on persistence and shedding of influenza A viruses from the upper airways at day 2. Viral titres were significantly lower in the treatment arm
Notes The trial is well‐reported and definitely randomised. Allocation concealment is described and appears to be adequate
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate