Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 13;2014(12):CD001941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001941.pub3

Comparison 2. Volume‐cycled ventilation versus pressure‐cycled ventilation.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality at one year (here 3‐month data) 1 16 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.29 [0.10, 17.14]
2 No improvement of daytime hypercapnia: short‐term 1 20 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.49, 2.05]
3 Daytime PaCO2: short‐term 3   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.45 [‐0.21, 1.10]
4 Forced vital capacity: short‐term 1   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 40.00 [‐7.04, 87.04]
5 Respiratory muscles strength 1   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.97 [‐3.99, 0.04]
5.1 Maximal inspiratory pressure 1   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐2.2 [‐4.92, 0.52]
5.2 Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure 1   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.7 [‐4.70, 1.30]
6 Mean nocturnal SaO2: short‐term 1   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 1.2 [‐0.70, 3.10]
7 Time spent with nocturnal SaO2 below 90%: short‐term 2   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 6.83 [4.68, 8.98]
8 Apnoea‐hypopnoea index (/hour): short‐term 2   Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.65 [‐0.84, ‐0.46]