Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD001817. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001817.pub2

Kao 1994.

Methods Blinding of randomization: unclear: All investigators but one were blinded. The role of this investigator in the study and in patient care is not clearly stated. 
 Blinding of intervention: unclear (see above). 
 Complete follow‐up: no: 43 out of 49 patients completed the study. Six were eliminated, three in each group, including 5 at the request of the parents and 1 because parents moved out of state. 
 Blinding of outcome: unclear (see above). 
 Randomized trial, parallel design. 
 Washout period: 3‐5 days before the study
Participants Patients entered into the study: n=49 
 No mechanical ventilation. 
 Entry criteria: typical radiographic appearance of Northway stage II or IV BPD, history of mechanical ventilatory support for > 1 month, stability after extubation for > week, weight > 1.5 kg, fractional excretion of O2 (FiO2) 0.30‐0.50. 
 Exclusion criteria: rib cage deformities, congenital heart disease, chromosomal abnormalities.
Interventions Thiazide vs placebo. 
 Patients were randomly allocated to receive either treatment (chlorothiazide 40 mg/kg/day and spironolactone 4 mg/kg/day divided in 2 doses per day) (N=25) or placebo (N=24). The medications were continued until the infant was weaned off O2. When the infant was stable without supplemental O2 for 1 week, the dose was tapered over a 1‐2 week period and then discontinued. Total duration of randomized therapy was similar in the treatment group (138±58 days) and in the control group (148±49 days).
Outcomes Main outcome: to determine whether patients benefit from continuing diuretic administration until they no longer require oxygen. Secondary outcome: natural history of BPD, by measuring pulmonary mechanics during the first year of life.
Notes The authors measured thoracic gas volume and airway resistance by plethysmography and dynamic compliance using an esophageal balloon.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomized trial, parallel design
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Blinding of randomization: unclear: All investigators but one were blinded. The role of this investigator in the study and in patient care is not clearly stated.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding of intervention: unclear 
 Blinding of outcome: unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Complete follow‐up: no: 43 out of 49 patients completed the study. Six were eliminated, three in each group, including 5 at the request of the parents and 1 because parents moved out of state.