Table 5.

Results of performance evaluation of 14 LCPs in Jianghan Plain of Hubei province.

Project Number	Correlation Degree				Performance Level
	${\mathit{K}}_1\left({\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{x}}\right)$	${\mathit{K}}_2\left({\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{x}}\right)$	${\mathit{K}}_3\left({\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{x}}\right)$	${\mathit{K}}_4\left({\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{x}}\right)$
LCP1-GLM	−0.03019	−0.01010	0.00558	−0.02378	General
LCP2-GLM	−0.03952	−0.02237	−0.00921	0.00076	Poor
LCP3-CLM	0.00322	−0.01923	−0.07266	−0.14262	Excellent
LCP4-GLM	−0.03667	−0.01959	−0.00425	−0.00241	Poor
LCP5-CLM	−0.02333	−0.00681	−0.01027	−0.05355	Good
LCP6-CLM	−0.02665	−0.03900	−0.07904	−0.10967	Excellent
LCP7-CLM	−0.02247	−0.00530	−0.00627	−0.04078	Good
LCP8-CLM	−0.01415	−0.01872	−0.03681	−0.06815	Excellent
LCP9-GLM	−0.03160	−0.01412	0.00572	−0.01750	General
LCP10-GLM	−0.03777	−0.02553	−0.01114	−0.00184	Poor
LCP11-GLM	−0.04047	−0.01930	−0.00865	−0.00725	Poor
LCP12-GLM	−0.02143	−0.00416	−0.01447	−0.05922	Good
LCP13-CLM	−0.02207	−0.01219	−0.02529	−0.04369	Good
LCP14-CLM	−0.03699	−0.02169	−0.00559	−0.00769	General