Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;17(4):1327. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041327

Table 4.

Multivariable regression analysis of impacts of the cancer treatment on health service use and catastrophic health expenditure.

Treatment Type Outpatient Visit Inpatient Visit Catastrophic Health Expenditure
AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI
All
Chinese traditional medicine 2.156 * 1.193 3.896 1.091 0.589 2.019 1.873 0.987 3.554
Western modern medicine 2.171 ** 1.292 3.649 1.124 0.658 1.919 1.358 0.779 2.367
Surgery therapy 2.224 ** 1.299 3.809 2.244 ** 1.313 3.834 3.697 *** 2.052 6.662
Radiation/chemotherapy 1.373 0.731 2.579 2.504 ** 1.369 4.579 2.361 ** 1.232 4.526
Treatment overall 2.492 *** 1.506 4.125 1.817 * 1.098 3.007 2.744 *** 1.578 4.772
Urban
Chinese traditional medicine 1.973 0.828 4.697 1.161 0.481 2.805 2.763 * 1.045 7.307
Western modern medicine 2.606 * 1.135 5.981 1.500 0.673 3.343 2.389 0.977 5.839
Surgery therapy 2.077 0.905 4.765 3.487 ** 1.509 8.058 9.723 *** 3.393 27.866
Radiation/chemotherapy 2.255 0.852 5.963 2.290 0.889 5.901 3.080 * 1.066 8.898
Treatment overall 2.168 0.968 4.855 2.441 * 1.108 5.379 7.277 ** 2.325 22.774
Rural
Chinese traditional medicine 2.315 0.968 5.539 0.906 0.345 2.382 1.303 0.492 3.447
Western modern medicine 1.991 0.975 4.067 0.950 0.436 2.070 1.088 0.500 2.366
Surgery therapy 3.169 ** 1.440 6.974 1.802 0.820 3.961 2.726 * 1.212 6.131
Radiation/chemotherapy 1.101 0.457 2.655 3.603 ** 1.496 8.682 3.402 * 1.270 9.115
Treatment overall 3.017 ** 1.536 5.929 1.654 0.822 3.329 2.133 * 1.057 4.306

Note: The control variables in logistic regressions included: age, gender, marital status, education, residence location, region, health insurance, economic status and complication. AOR, Adjusted Odds Ratio. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, significance test.