Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 13;17(4):1214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041214

Table 3.

Self-reported productivity change and absenteeism due to health problems.

Metrics Change from Baseline
hrs £’s
Productivity change Intervention n 65
Mean non-zero 2.41 £62.83
Mean
(95% CI)
1.75 (gain)
(0.09 to 3.42)
£33.72 (gain)
(£60.87 to -£6.58)
Control n 52
Mean non-zero -1.07 -£35.21
Mean
(95% CI)
-0.44 (loss)
(-2.09 to 1.21)
-£17.68 (loss)
(-£50.44 to £15.08)
Delta (I-C) Mean
(95%CI)
2.19
(-0.16 to 4.55)
£51.41
(£9.68 to £93.13)
Adjusted difference a Mean
(95% CI)
1.58
(-0.50 to 3.67)
£47.36
(£6.50 to £88.22)
p-value 0.137 0.023
Sickness Absence Intervention n 66
Mean non-zero 3.65 £46.52
Mean
(95%CI)
0.28
(-0.43 to 0.99)
£5.42
(-£3.76 to £14.61)
Control n 52
Mean non-zero 7.67 £64.86
Mean
(95%CI)
0.23
(-0.77 to 1.22)
£3.33
(-£8.46 to £15.13)
Delta (I-C) Mean
(95% CI)
0.05
(-1.12 to 1.23)
£2.09
(-£12.47 to £16.64)
Adjusted difference a Mean
(95% CI)
0.07
(-1.27 to 1.41)
£3.82
(-£13.41 to £21.04)
p-value 0.918 0.664

a Adjusted difference in the productivity and sickness absence between treatment groups (intervention group compared to control group) with 95% confidence interval, p-value; adjusted for cluster effect, sex, ethnicity and stratification categories (office size <4 and office size>=4).