Table 3.
Results of moderated mediation analysis: The relationship between servant leadership and work outcomes as mediated by EWB and moderated by WPCC.
| Predictor | Outcome | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWB | Task Performance | Innovative Work Behavior | Work Engagement | |||||
| B | p | B | p | B | p | B | p | |
| Servant leadership (SL) | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.14 | <0.01 | 0.23 | <0.01 | 0.35 | <0.01 |
| WPCC | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.04 | −0.13 | <0.01 | 0.07 | 0.16 |
| Interaction SL × WPCC | 0.14 | <0.01 | 0.15 | <0.01 | −0.13 | 0.02 | −0.03 | 0.60 |
| EWB | 0.53 | <0.01 | 0.23 | <0.01 | 0.57 | <0.01 | ||
| R² = 0.06 | R² = 0.21 | R² = 0.21 | R² = 0.32 | |||||
| F = 6.57 | F = 20.14 | F = 10.15 | F = 36.72 | |||||
| p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | |||||
Note: SL: Servant leadership; WPCC: Workplace civility climate; EWB: Eudaimonic well-being. For the outcome variable Innovative work behavior we controlled for age (B = −0.01, p = 0.13); gender (B = −0.12, p = 0.03; tenure (B = −0.00, p = 0.03); work hours (B = 0.02, p <0.01).