Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;17(4):1309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041309

Table 2.

Associations between the objective built environment features and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and the moderating effects of concordance/discordance between perceived and objectively measured presence or absence of built environment features (n = 354).

Built Environment Feature Weekday MVPA (min/day) n = 412 Weekend MVPA (min/day) n = 356
500 m
B (95% CI)
1 km
B (95% CI)
500 m
B (95% CI)
1 km
B (95% CI)
Park (n) 1 −0.10 (−0.51, 0.30) 0.02 (−0.12, 0.17) 0.23 (−0.34, 0.81) 0.22 (0.01, 0.43) *
Interaction 2:
x discordant 3 −0.09 (−0.97, 0.79) 0.25 (−0.07, 0.58) 0.27 (−1.07, 1.61) 0.27 (−0.19, 0.75)
Recreation facility (n) 1 −0.53 (−2.64, 1.56) 0.41 (−0.46, 1.28) 2.29 (−0.73, 5.32) 1.69 (0.47, 2.91) **
Interaction 2:
x discordant 3 1.52 (−2.92, 5.97) 1.67 (−0.03, 3.37) 4.86 (−1.71, 11.45) 1.11 (−1.31, 3.54)
Trails (n) 1 0.57 (−2.93, 4.08) 1.78 (−0.46, 4.02) -0.01 (−5.17, 5.17) 1.83 (−1.50, 5.18)
Interaction 2:
x discordant 3 −4.53 (−11.80, 2.73) −5.38 (−9.76, −1.01) * −3.33 (−14.38, 7.71) −8.06 (−14.72, −1.40) *

All models adjusted for age, sex and neighbourhood disadvantage; 1 Main effect model; 2 Model including main effects and interaction term between built environmental feature and concordance/discordance of environmental measures; 3 Reference group = concordant. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01