Table 3.
Task self-efficacy, enjoyment, and acceptability of the REHIT intervention
| Task self-efficacy a | 7.8 ± 1.2 |
|---|---|
| Enjoyment | |
| Enjoyment of REHIT exercise sessionsa | 7.5 ± 1.5 |
| Expected future enjoyment of REHIT exercise sessionsa | 7.2 ± 1.9 |
| Modified PACESb | 89.1 ± 16.6 |
| Acceptability c | |
| “Doing REHIT has been enjoyable” | 4.4 ± 0.8 |
| “I would recommend REHIT to others” | 4.6 ± 0.5 |
| “REHIT has been physically more demanding than I expected” | 3.3 ± 1.3 |
| “I would be happy to continue to do REHIT” | 4.5 ± 0.8 |
| “Doing REHIT has interfered with other aspects of my life due to the time commitment” | 1.5 ± 0.7 |
| “Doing REHIT has interfered with other aspects of my life due to the travelling involved” | 1.8 ± 1.4 |
| “Doing REHIT has interfered with other aspects of my life due to the physical strain” | 1.6 ± 1.0 |
| “I believe REHIT has improved my fitness” | 3.7 ± 0.6 |
| “I am pleased to have done something to improve my fitness” | 4.5 ± 0.9 |
| “I would have preferred to exercise in a group setting” | 2.5 ± 1.0 |
| “I would have preferred to exercise at home” | 2.5 ± 1.1 |
a: scored on a scale of 1 (not at all confident/enjoyable) to 9 (extremely confident/enjoyable)
b: overall enjoyment score from 17 (not enjoyable at all) to 119 (enjoyable)
c: scored on 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 3 (neither agree nor disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)