Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 12;19:32. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1148-2

Table 2.

prevalence and prevalence ratios of self-treatment regarding associated factors

Variables Prevalence of self-treatment % (95% CI) Bivariate analysis Multiple regression
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Elders in Sinan County 35.2 (30.0, 40.6)
Socio-economic status
Gender  men 28.8 (21.9, 36.6) 1.00 1.00
 women 40.8 (33.4, 48.5) 1.70 (1.07,2.69)* 1.68 (0.95,2.97)
Age  60–74 33.3 (27.8, 39.2) 1.00 1.00
  ≥ 75 45.1 (31.1, 59.7) 1.64 (0.90,3.01) 1.71 (0.87,3.35)
Poverty  no 38.8 (32.4, 45.4) 1.00 1.00
 yes 27.2(18.9, 36.8) 0.59 (0.35,0.98)* 0.69 (0.40,1.18)
Empty-nest  no 36.2 (29.1, 43.7) 1.00 1.00
 yes 34.0 (26.5, 42.1) 0.91 (0.58,1.43) 0.94 (0.57,1.55)
Illiteracy  no 33.2 (26.5, 40.4) 1.00 1.00
 yes 37.8 (29.8, 46.2) 1.22 (0.77,1.93) 0.88 (0.51,1.53)
Health status
Chronic diseases  no 43.5 (32.8, 54.7) 1.00 1.00
 yes 32.2 (26.4, 38.5) 0.61 (0.37,1.02) 0.87 (0.50,1.52)
TTO-value 4.73 (1.54,14.45)** 6.75 (1.93,23.60)**
Health behaviors
Self-care in TCM  no 42.0 (33.0, 51.4) 1.00 1.00
 yes 31.3 (25.1, 38.0) 0.63 (0.39,1.00)* 0.67 (0.40,1.12)
Drinking alcohol  no 39.4 (33.4, 45.6) 1.00 1.00
 yes 19.7 (11.2, 30.9) 0.37 (0.20,0.71)** 0.42 (0.21,0.83)*
Health service
Distancea   < 1 km 36.3 (29.5, 43.6) 1.00 1.00
 2-3 km 34.0 (24.9, 44.0) 0.90 (0.55,1.49) 0.78 (0.45,1.35)
  > 3 km 32.4 (18.0, 49.8) 0.84 (0.40,1.78) 0.84 (0.39,1.86)
Family practiceb  no 40.4 (32.9, 48.1) 1.00 1.00
 yes 29.6 (22.6, 37.3) 0.62 (0.39,0.98)* 0.59 (0.36,0.96)*

aDistance to the nearest medical institution

bUtilization of family practice service

*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01