Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 10;11(6):1649–1656. doi: 10.1039/c9sc06337d

Fig. 2. In vitro evaluation of MB release, O2 generation, photodynamic and photothermal performance of PMCZ. (A) Time-dependent release profiles of MB from PMCZ (50 μg mL–1) at different external pH stimuli. (B) 1O2 production efficiency of the different samples with different treatments. (1) DPBF; (2) DPBF and 660 nm photoirradiation (100 mW cm–2); (3) DPBF and H2O2 (100 μM); (4) DPBF, H2O2 (100 μM) and 660 nm photoirradiation (100 mW cm–2); (5) DPBF and PMCZ (50 μg mL–1) at pH 7.4; (6) DPBF and PMCZ (50 μg mL–1) at pH 5.0; (7) DPBF, PMCZ (50 μg mL–1) and H2O2 (100 μM) at pH 5.0. (C) O2 generation of these different samples after being incubated with RDPP under different conditions. (1) H2O2 (100 μM); (2) H2O2 (100 μM) and PDAs (50 μg mL–1); (3) H2O2 (100 μM) and PZ (50 μg mL–1); (4) H2O2 (100 μM) and PMZ (50 μg mL–1); (5) H2O2 (100 μM) and PMCZ (50 μg mL–1); (6) H2O2 (500 μM) and PMCZ (50 μg mL–1); (7) H2O2 (1000 μM) and PMCZ (50 μg mL–1). (D) Heating curves of PMCZ with different concentrations upon 808 nm photoirradiation (2 W cm–2).

Fig. 2