Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 12;53(4):416–425. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001434

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of the diagnostic and prognostic value of suPAR based on different variables

Study type Variables Studies, no. (patients, no.) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PLR (95% CI) NLR (95% CI) DOR (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
Diagnostic value Sepsis 17 (2722) 0.76 (0.63–0.86) 0.78 (0.72–0.83) 3.50 (2.60–4.70) 0.30 (0.18–0.50) 12 (6–24) 0.83 (0.80–0.86)
Sepsis from SIRS 5 (637) 0.67 (0.58–0.76) 0.82 (0.73–0.88) 3.70 (2.40–5.80) 0.40 (0.30–0.53) 9 (5–18) 0.81 (0.77–0.84)
Bacterial Sepsis 8 (1316) 0.81 (0.57–0.94) 0.73 (0.66–0.79) 3.10 (2.30–4.00) 0.25 (0.10–0.66) 12 (4–38) 0.79 (0.75–0.82)
Cutoff <7.5 ng/mL 8 (1471) 0.85 (0.67–0.94) 0.77 (0.70–0.82) 3.60 (2.50–5.40) 0.20 (0.08–0.50) 18 (5–66) 0.83 (0.80–0.86)
Cutoff ≥7.5 ng/mL 9 (1251) 0.66 (0.50–0.78) 0.79 (0.69–0.87) 3.20 (2.10–4.90) 0.43 (0.29–0.64) 7 (4–15) 0.80 (0.76–0.83)
Prognostic value Sepsis 19 (5622) 0.74 (0.67–0.80) 0.70 (0.63–0.76) 2.50 (2.00–3.00) 0.38 (0.30–0.47) 7 (5–9) 0.78 (0.74–0.82)
Bacterial Sepsis 8 (2114) 0.68 (0.59–0.76) 0.77 (0.66–0.85) 2.90 (2.10–4.10) 0.41 (0.34–0.51) 7 (5–10) 0.77 (0.73–0.81)
Cutoff <9.6 ng/mL 9 (2386) 0.72 (0.66–0.77) 0.65 (0.58–0.72) 2.10 (1.60–2.60) 0.43 (0.34–0.56) 5 (3–8) 0.74 (0.70–0.78)
Cutoff ≥9.6 ng/mL 10 (3236) 0.74 (0.61–0.84) 0.75 (0.64–0.83) 3.00 (2.10–4.10) 0.35 (0.24–0.51) 9 (5–14) 0.81 (0.77–0.84)

AUC, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; PLR, positive likelihood ratio.