Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 4;75(4):968–978. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz548

Table 1.

Bacterial isolates and specific resistance mechanisms used in the evaluation of the RAST method

Species (number of isolates) and antimicrobial agents tested (BMD as referencea) Number of R isolates Resistance mechanism identifiedb
E. coli (n=60)
 piperacillin/tazobactam 14
  • SHV-12

  • CTX-M

  • VIM-1

  • OXA-1

  • OXA-48

  • NDM-1

 cefotaxime 25
 ceftazidime 20
 meropenem 3
 ciprofloxacin 21
 amikacin 1
 gentamicin 17
 tobramycin 20
K. pneumoniae (n=52)
 piperacillin/tazobactam 18
  • SHV-5

  • CTX-M

  • KPC

  • OXA-48

 cefotaxime 20
 ceftazidime 16
 meropenem 6
 ciprofloxacin 21
 amikacin 3
 gentamicin 16
 tobramycin 17
P. aeruginosa (n=53)
 piperacillin/tazobactam 17 multiple and mixed resistance mechanisms
 ceftazidime 15
 imipenem 15
 meropenem 11
 ciprofloxacin 24
 gentamicin 14
 tobramycin 11
S. aureus (n=54)
 cefoxitin (screen) 21 MRSA
 norfloxacin (screen) 17
 gentamicin 8
 erythromycin 17
 clindamycin 7
E. faecalis (n=23)
 ampicillin 0
  • VRE (vanA, vanB)

  • HLAR

 imipenem 0
 gentamicin (screen) 17
 linezolid 2
 vancomycin 9
E. faecium (n=34)
 ampicillin 31
  • VRE (vanA, vanB)

  • HLAR

 imipenem 33
 gentamicin (screen) 19
 linezolid 6
 vancomycin 22
S. pneumoniae (n=56)
 oxacillin (screen) 24 benzylpenicillin non-WT (screen positive with oxacillin 1 μg disc and with benzylpenicillin MICs of 0.125–4 mg/L)
 norfloxacin (screen) 8
 erythromycin 26
 clindamycin 10
 trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole 11
Control strains (n=5)
  • E. coli ATCC 25922

  • P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853

  • S. aureus ATCC 29213

  • E. faecalis ATCC 29212

  • S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619

For more information on isolates and MIC distributions, see Tables S1 to S7.

a

BMD was used as reference, with the exceptions listed as ‘screen’, where EUCAST standard disc diffusion screen tests were used. For S. aureus, PCR was used as reference for methicillin resistance.

b

In some cases, resistance genes/mechanisms were identified through WGS.