Table 1.
Bacterial isolates and specific resistance mechanisms used in the evaluation of the RAST method
Species (number of isolates) and antimicrobial agents tested (BMD as referencea) | Number of R isolates | Resistance mechanism identifiedb |
---|---|---|
E. coli (n = 60) | ||
piperacillin/tazobactam | 14 |
|
cefotaxime | 25 | |
ceftazidime | 20 | |
meropenem | 3 | |
ciprofloxacin | 21 | |
amikacin | 1 | |
gentamicin | 17 | |
tobramycin | 20 | |
K. pneumoniae (n = 52) | ||
piperacillin/tazobactam | 18 |
|
cefotaxime | 20 | |
ceftazidime | 16 | |
meropenem | 6 | |
ciprofloxacin | 21 | |
amikacin | 3 | |
gentamicin | 16 | |
tobramycin | 17 | |
P. aeruginosa (n = 53) | ||
piperacillin/tazobactam | 17 | multiple and mixed resistance mechanisms |
ceftazidime | 15 | |
imipenem | 15 | |
meropenem | 11 | |
ciprofloxacin | 24 | |
gentamicin | 14 | |
tobramycin | 11 | |
S. aureus (n = 54) | ||
cefoxitin (screen) | 21 | MRSA |
norfloxacin (screen) | 17 | |
gentamicin | 8 | |
erythromycin | 17 | |
clindamycin | 7 | |
E. faecalis (n = 23) | ||
ampicillin | 0 |
|
imipenem | 0 | |
gentamicin (screen) | 17 | |
linezolid | 2 | |
vancomycin | 9 | |
E. faecium (n = 34) | ||
ampicillin | 31 |
|
imipenem | 33 | |
gentamicin (screen) | 19 | |
linezolid | 6 | |
vancomycin | 22 | |
S. pneumoniae (n = 56) | ||
oxacillin (screen) | 24 | benzylpenicillin non-WT (screen positive with oxacillin 1 μg disc and with benzylpenicillin MICs of 0.125–4 mg/L) |
norfloxacin (screen) | 8 | |
erythromycin | 26 | |
clindamycin | 10 | |
trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole | 11 | |
Control strains (n = 5) | ||
|
– |
BMD was used as reference, with the exceptions listed as ‘screen’, where EUCAST standard disc diffusion screen tests were used. For S. aureus, PCR was used as reference for methicillin resistance.
In some cases, resistance genes/mechanisms were identified through WGS.