Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 6;9(69):40565–40576. doi: 10.1039/c9ra08861j

Comparison of the photocatalytic efficiency of nanocellulose–TiO2 composite systems prepared by different methods.

TiO2 nanoparticle size Precursor Catalytic application Performance Ref.
3–4 nm Ti(SO4)2 Photodegradation of methyl blue and antibacterial activity >98% dye removal This work
>99% bacteria reduction
20–40 nm Ti(SO4)2 (hydrothermal) Photodegradation of methyl orange >99% dye removal 77
4.3–8.5 nm Ti(OBu)4 (hydrothermal) Photodegradation of methyl orange >99% dye removal 78
∼20 nm Commercial Antibacterial activity Up to 87.9% bacteria reduction 79
∼200 nm Ti(OiPr)4 (microwave) Photodegradation of rhodamine B 74% dye removal 80
12 nm Commercial Antibacterial activity Up to 50% bacteria reduction 81
<25 nm Commercial Degradation of nitrophenols Up to 88% nitrophenols removal 82
N/A Ti(OiPr)4 Photodegradation of eosin Y Up to 90% dye removal 83
Nanotube with 7 nm thickness CVD Photodegradation of methyl blue >99% dye removal 84