Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 25;270(3):311–324. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0949-4

Table 2.

Prevalence and effects of age on the report of the 11 criteria-relevant basic symptoms (BS) assessed in all age groups, irrespective of novelty and frequency requirements; binary logistic regression analyses with method “enter” and 20- to 24-year-olds as the reference age group

Age group (years) β SE Wald (df = 1) p after bootstrap Exp (β) 95% CI Number present % present
≥ 1 BS (in 20–24 years: n = 18, 12%)
 8–12 1.018 0.420 5.872 0.021 2.768 1.22–6.31 12 27
 13–15 1.432 0.451 10.061 0.001 4.186 1.73–10.14 11 36
 16–17 0.595 0.381 2.431 0.113 1.812 0.86–3.83 15 19
 18–19 0.980 0.357 7.551 0.006 2.664 1.32–5.36 21 26
 25–29a − 0.566 0.413 1.879 0.156 0.568 0.25–1.28 10 7
 30–40 0.000 0.355 0.000 0.999 1.000 0.50–2.00 18 12
≥ 1 cognitive BS (in 20–24 years: n = 12, 8%)
 8–12 0.946 0.492 3.696 0.049 2.577 0.98–6.76 8 18
 13–15 1.584 0.497 10.164 0.002 4.875 1.84–12.91 9 29
 16–17b 0.671 0.443 2.296 0.116 1.956 0.82–4.66 11 14
 18–19 1.225 0.402 9.280 0.001 3.405 1.55–7.49 18 22
 25–29 − 0.496 0.490 1.024 0.299 0.233 0.23–1.59 7 5
 30–40 0.000 0.425 0.000 1.000 0.435 0.44–2.30 12 8
≥ 1 perceptive BS (in 20–24 years: n = 7, 5%)
 8–12 0.972 0.612 2.521 0.094 2.643 0.80–8.77 5 11
 13–15 0.818 0.720 1.289 0.255 2.265 0.55–9.29 3 10
 16–17 0.882 0.537 2.694 0.088 2.416 0.84–6.93 8 10
 18–19 0.094 0.642 0.021 0.8674 1.098 0.31–3.87 4 5
 25–29 − 0.504 0.638 0.625 0.431 0.604 0.17–2.11 4 3
 30–40 − 0.161 0.568 0.080 0.765 0.851 0.28–2.59 6 4

Significant predictors (p < 0.05) are in bold type, predictors with significance at statistical trend (p < 0.10) in bold italics

aLower prevalence in comparison to 20- to 24-year-olds became significant when the cognitive BS that are only assessable from age 13 onwards were considered (Exp (β) = 0.473; 95% CI 0.23–0.98, p (bootstrap) = 0.040)

bHigher prevalence in comparison to 20- to 24-year-olds reached statistical trend level when the cognitive BS that are only assessable from age 13 onwards were considered (Exp (β) = 1.847; 95% CI 0.89–3.83, p (bootstrap) = 0.083)