Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 13;3:118. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0858-8

Table 3.

Comparison of various evaluation criteria based on varying number of training samples.

Percentage Acc. (%) Sen. (%) Spec. (%) Prec. (%) MCC (%) AUC (%)
20% 78.03 73.56 82.51 80.79 56.29 85.61
40% 84.56 80.90 88.21 87.28 69.30 91.52
60% 87.27 84.34 90.19 89.58 74.66 93.67
80% 89.78 87.60 91.95 91.59 79.63 95.39