Table 3.
Coding criteria with descriptive anchors and percentage of use anchors
| TBT coding | 5-Point Likert Scale | 3-Point Likert Scale |
|---|---|---|
|
Each teaching trial was coded for the presence or absence of provider use of PRT strategies within the trial. Frequency data were then aggregated across each minute to facilitate comparison with other coding scales. |
5 “Provider implements competently throughout the session” (100%) |
3 “Provider implements competently most of the time, but misses some opportunities” Provider implements competently throughout the session” |
|
4 “Provider implements competently most of the time, but misses some opportunities” (80–99%) | ||
|
3 “Provider implements competently half the time, but misses many opportunities” (50–79%) |
2 “Provider implements competently occasionally, but misses many opportunities” “Provider implements competently half the time, but misses many opportunities” |
|
|
2 “Provider implements competently occasionally, but misses many opportunities” (30–49%) | ||
|
1 “Provider does not implement during the session or never implements appropriately” (0–29%) |
1 “Provider does not implement during the session or never implements appropriately” |
|
|
0 (Not Applicable) “Provider does not have the opportunity to implement during the session” |
0 (Not Applicable) “Provider does not have the opportunity to implement during the session” |