Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 14;13(1):29–39. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00337-6

Table 5.

Percentage of videos with agreement between trial-by-trial and Likert Scale coding for individual pivotal response training components

Component TBT to 5-point LS TBT to 3-point LS 5-point to 3-point
Percentage of exact agreement Mastery criteria met agreement (%) Krippendorff’s alpha (Kα) Percentage of exact agreement Mastery criteria met agreement (%) Krippendorff’s alpha (Kα) Percentage of exact agreement Mastery criteria met agreement (%) Krippendorff’s alpha (Kα)
Student attention 100.0 100.0 1.0 72.2 72.2 0.09 72.2 72.2 0.09
Clear cue 100.0 100.0 1.0 83.3 83.3 0.29 83.3 83.3 0.29
Developmental appropriate 100.0 100.0 1.0 83.3 83.3 0.30 83.3 83.3 0.30
Shared control 100.0 100.0 1.0 66.7 66.7 − 0.16 63.9 63.9 − 0.19
Maintenance/acquisition 94.4 100.0 .98 50.0 63.9 0.46 44.4 69.4 0.46
Turn taking 100.0 100.0 1.0 55.6 63.9 0.49 27.8 47.2 0.12
Contingent consequences 100.0 100.0 1.0 72.2 72.2 − 0.13 55.6 55.6 − 0.15
Reinforcement of appropriate behavior 100.0 100.0 1.0 66.7 75.0 0.59 38.9 52.8 0.15
Direct reinforcement 100.0 100.0 1.0 72.2 75.0 0.08 55.6 66.7 0.56
Reinforcement of attempts 100.0 100.0 1.0 44.4 52.8 0.24 61.1 63.9 < − 0.01

LS Likert Scale