Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;7(2):ENEURO.0435-19.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0435-19.2019

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Paradigm and behavioral data. A, Participants discriminated the direction of visual random-dot motion (800 ms stimulus duration). Across three conditions, the visual motion was accompanied by different auxiliary cues: simultaneous acoustic motion, a visual symbolic cue preceding the visual motion, or a visual symbolic cue following the motion stimulus. Each cue was congruent with the random-dot motion on 66% of trials. B, For each cue type, response accuracy was higher for congruent trials, while reaction times (relative to a response cue) were not affected by congruency (mean and SEM across participants; dots represent single-participant data). C, Psychophysical response templates (weights) were calculated to quantify the influence of the moment-by-moment motion energy on behavior. These templates were significant for most time points (top; thick black line, grand average; thin black line, 5% bootstrap confidence interval across conditions; thick colored lines, condition-wise group means), but were not affected by cue–stimulus congruence (bottom; think lines, condition wise group means; dashed lines, 5% bootstrap confidence intervals).