Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;9(2):169. doi: 10.3390/antiox9020169

Table 2.

Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of tamarillo separated by cultivars and tissues. Values are expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 4).

Tissues Cultivars Total Phenolic Content (mg GAE/100 g DW) CUPRAC Value
(μmol TEAC/g DW)
FRAP Value
(μmol TEAC/g DW)
Peel Amber 1583.8 ± 40.09ax 117.59 ± 9.35ax 84.7 ± 11.13ax
Laird’s Large 1673.28 ± 63.97bx 136.68 ± 6.72bx 102.55 ± 12.19bx
Mulligan 2225.06 ± 50.87cx 265.29 ± 18.35cx 161.74 ± 14.53cx
Pulp Amber 678.98± 19.09ay 42.92 ± 8.73ay 52.23 ± 6.7ay
Laird’s Large 707.04 ± 30.65by 52.42 ± 8.39by 60.19 ± 5.21by
Mulligan 874.9 ± 30.48cy 71.57 ± 7.81cy 72.14 ± 9.41cy
p-value * C <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
T <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
C × T <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

* Statistical significance for cultivar (C), tissue (T) and the interaction of both types (C × T). Means shown in a,b,c are significantly different at p < 0.05 between cultivars. Means shown in x,y are significantly different at p < 0.05 between tissues. FRAP: Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma and CUPRAC: Cupric Ion-Reducing Antioxidant Capacity.